ARROW's New Banner

So, after a volley of great comments here's my latest shot at the banner. What do you all think of this one?

Submitted by kb6nu on Thu, 09/27/2007 - 16:59. login or register to post comments
at least 2 banners there!
Submitted by K9TRV on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 13:34.

I agree with Jeff. It's at least two banners. One has the logo on the left with our 'slogan' (see catchy phrase below fuzzy line) on the right, with our web address in smaller print below it. Slogan needs catchy 'since 19XX' added to end to indicate how long we've been doing this.

Smudged lines are OK, too. Probably smaller than now and only under the 'slogan' part.

I may not be fast at it, but I CAN read/write CW.

ANYTHING ELSE belongs on a separate banner. It's that simple, folks. Now how about showing us what that would look like, Dan?

George K9TRV

login or register to post comments
Banner
Submitted by n8pjr on Fri, 09/28/2007 - 00:54.

I agree with Jeff. It's a sign not a banner.
Two separate logos is a good idea. Pat,N8PJR

login or register to post comments
Banner
Submitted by w8sgz on Thu, 09/27/2007 - 18:19.

First, I think we need to decide what the banner is for. This design is fine for the fence at Signal Hill during Field Day, but wouldn't work for carrying in the 4th of July parade. A "banner", almost by definition is long and skinny, not square. Depending on the finished size, it might hang on the side of the trailer OK, but it might be overpowering.
But if we ever actually deploy on anything approaching an emergency situation, the "Fun!" is definitely inappropriate.
How much do these things cost? Maybe we could handle two of them for different uses.
BTW, the line that Jay pointed out is still broken and kind of juddery. Can that be fixed?

login or register to post comments